On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:03:09AM +0200, Michel Talon wrote: > > I guess I'm still just a bit stunned that a bug this obvious not only > > found it's way into the STABLE branch, but is still there. Maybe it's > > not as obvious as I think, or not many folks are using it? All I know > > for sure here is that if I had upgraded to 6.1 my network would have > > been crippled. > > Strange, since i upgraded to FreeBSD-6.1 and the NFS server to Fedora Core 5, > my machine, NFS client is happy, and lockd works. It is first time since > years i have no problem. It certainly did not work with FreeBSD-5 and i still > have a machine with FreeBSD-6.0 which does not work properly (frequently loses > the NFS mount, but it gets remounted some times later by amd). Anyways i have > exactly 0 problem with the 6.1 machine. I could extend that to say that > everything works very well on that machine, nothing is slow, including disk > access. This has not always been the case. Stability wise, i have not seen any > panic, hang or whatever since i have compiled a kernel adapted to my hardware. > I got a panic with the generic kernel soon after installation, but now > machine is totally stable.
I only started to see the lockd problems when upgrading the server side to FreeBSD 6.x and later. I had various FreeBSD clients, between 4.x and 7-current and the lockd problem only showed up when upgrading the server from 5.x to 6.x. John -- John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
