On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:04:37PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > > Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >> Brooks Davis wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >>>> I normally run the command > >>>> # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< > >>>> before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This > >>>> time I got the following output: > >>>> > >>>> diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 < needs updating (index has > >>>> 1.5.0.07.00) > >>>> > >>>> It seems that the tool is confused by the i386 in the package name. > >>> Actually I think it's confused by the fact that the package name is > >>> "diablo-jdk" and the version is "freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00". That's > >>> just plain bogus. > >>> > >> So who is at fault? The ports infrastructure or the FreeBSD foundation? > > > > I don't know. How did you install it? > > # pkg_add diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00.tbz
It definitly installs correctly if you use the port instead of the package. It looks like the package is incorrect. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
pgpTC8REfeBKs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
