Hi. On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 09:15:47AM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > I don't think its too much to ask that before something is MFC'd back > to -STABLE from -CURRENT that it <at least> be tested for the most > common functionality (that is, does it work at all?) In this case all > that someone had to do was boot the system and then detach and > reattach a mirror component - the most basic of functionality - to > detect that the patch was bad.
Thank god, nothing really can happen, if you deploy a new -STABLE on your servers, since of course before deploying a new piece of software it's being tested on a non-prod test setup, where you'll notice such apparent problems - especially when using -STABLE, where you never know, if you are probably just in the middle of a bigger commit. So, since nothing important could break, what's the hassle all about? - Oliver -- | Oliver Brandmueller | Offenbacher Str. 1 | Germany D-14197 Berlin | | Fon +49-172-3130856 | Fax +49-172-3145027 | WWW: http://the.addict.de/ | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. | | Eine gewerbliche Nutzung aller enthaltenen Adressen ist nicht gestattet! | _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
