Charles P. Schaum wrote: > A note on PC-BSD and DesktopBSD as compared to my -STABLE experiences: > > -STABLE works best. First, PC-BSD will panic under more conditions than > -RELEASE, -STABLE or DesktopBSD. I did some monkeying around and found > that to be true, especially with older boxes. Second, DesktopBSD works > better than PC-BSD, and noticeably so. But it's based on 5 and I want 6. > So that kinda throws a spanner in the works.
The DesktopBSD development version is based on 6-Stable. they're waiting for the 6.2 release to release their new release. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
