On 10/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I realize that resources to keep chasing this stuff are in limited supply, > but if you solicit the opinion of the community, I'd bet that more people > would rather see 4.x support continue than 5.x support. > > I know that it would be a violation of the stated policy, but I think that > supporting 4.x and 6.x over the next year would benefit way more people > than the current plan of supporting 5.x and 6.x and eol'ing 4.x. Yes, fully agreed. I'd much rather have longer support for 4.x than 5.x. We still have lots of machines running 4.11 here. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I fully agree with the delay in the 4x EOL. I know many people (including myself) who still run 4.x in dead end hardware for home firewalls/gateways and several other services that run in low, low end hardware. 4.x still has reasons to live for quite a while :) Best regards -- Alexandre Vieira - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
