On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:59:10AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 11, 2006, at 6:36 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
I think the most likely path of success is, as you say, to make the
4.x
userland more like 6.x.
For anyone who really wishes to stick to freebsd 4.x for performance, we
should refer them to dragonflybsd, which seems to be taking this approach.
it was forked from freebsd 4.8 and seems to pretty modern in userland.
Well, this is pretty unsubstantiated...it doesn't automatically follow that
because they forked from FreeBSD 4 they will retain all the characteristics
of FreeBSD 4.
FreeBSD 6.x is also a forked 4.x, FWIW :-).
Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
