Greg Black wrote: > Mark Linimon wrote: > > Greg Black wrote: > > > I found that a very large number of ports that mattered to me were marked > > > i386 only. > > > > In some cases these designations are obsolete. They will require people- > > power to work through them and see if they are overused. > > [...] > > it will take people with amd64 boxes running native willing to test them > > and report back. > [...] > Fair enough. In my defence, I'm fully committed at present and > I have only one amd64 machine which I need for my real work. I > can't afford to run it in amd64 mode, because so much of what I > need is currently broken in a 64-bit world.
By the way, you don't necessarily have to have an amd64 machine in order to be able to run FreeBSSD/amd64 and try 64bit software. Qemu supports emulating an amd64 CPU on an i386 system (and vice versa, for that matter). So you can run FreeBSD/amd64 on top of FreeBSD/i386 inside qemu and play with it. Admittedly it will be noticeably slower than running natively, though, because you can't use the qemu accelerator kernel module when emulating a different architecture. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. I suggested holding a "Python Object Oriented Programming Seminar", but the acronym was unpopular. -- Joseph Strout _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
