Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 03:08:58PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> Hello. >> Using these two sources for getting nfe() driver support for my FreeBSD >> 6.2-BETA/AMD64 box was pretty convenient in the past weeks due to my big >> interrupt problems using the nve() driver. >> But with yesterday, I can't get the sources anymore. nfe() isn't yet a >> part of the 6.2 BETA, that's what I looked first for, so can anybody >> help me out? Is nfe() a part of 6.2-REL in the near future or are there >> other reasons stop spreading the sources via that cvs source? >> >> Thanks for your help in advance, >> >> > Did you try the version at > http://www.se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~shigeaki/software/freebsd-nfe.html > ? I use it and except for some peer-to-peer gigabit problems I > didn't notice any other bad signs. It's far more stable that > what we have now in the CVS tree. > > > Cheers, > Thank you for the link. No, I did not try this link since I thought the CVS tree's version was the stabelst version we have. I find it convenient by pushing it via net using cvs just after I upgraded my CVS tree of the sources for the operating system. I will keep this link in mind. Is there a date we can this driver expect in FreeBSD 6.2? Or is the driver more subject to be merged in 6.2-STABLE and for 6.3? nve() isn't suitable, neither with SCHED_ULE (which I use now again) and with SCHED_4BSD, because on my hardware platform the interrupt generation is much higher than that of the nfe() driver - and due to this massive interrupts useless for me.
Regards, Oliver -- O. Hartmann Freie Universitaet Berlin Institut fuer Geowissenschaften Fernerkundung der Erde und Planeten Malteser-Str. 74 - 100/Haus D D-12249 Berlin Tel.: +49 (0) 30 838 70 508 FAX: +49 (0) 30 838 70 837 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
