On Friday 22 December 2006 09:43, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Friday, 22. December 2006 03:59, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >-5.x was never really for production use, in the same way 3.x never > > >was. > > > > Why do people continue to say this? > > Because everybody knows that odd numbered releases aren't stable. Just like > .0 and .1 releases are rushed out the door after a few months of mad > hackfest and patches being rushed back and forth on kernel.org. Smirk.
man, if that really is so then it has an easy solution, don't make 7. but make 8. ... :) but the better "believe" would be in better work instead of blaming odd release numbers -- João A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
