> not very important but wouldn't it be better to set the checksum > to 0 instead of some arbitrary (?) and confusing value then ?
No, as not setting the checksum is a (minor) optimization. Setting that field to any arbitrary constant means at least one completely unnecessary CPU instruction per datagram. Best wishes, Matthew -- "Rogues are very keen in their profession, and know already much more than we can teach them respecting their several kinds of roguery." - A. C. Hobbs in _Locks and Safes_ (1853) _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
