While I haven't seen any problem with patch itself since it just
adding a _useful_ knob, I personaly managed to use procmail to filter
most of that SPAM. My solution is not as CPU friendly as patch but
2000 messages is not an ultimate load for modern comps.

+1 for adding the patch. Also, will not die if not added :)

Just another 0.02UAH into the bike sched budget.

2007/6/20, Kurt Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi!

[on a bikeshed:]
> >3. Actual errors *will* be reported, and *will be read* if I don't
> >have to delete thousands of non-errors.
>
> Perhaps a separate mailbox dedicated to this task, with a script
> (grep?) that parses the emails in that mailbox daily looking for
> expected messages, noting and deleting them, with unsent messages
> noted via an email and messages with unexpected content forwarded as
> well?

Yes, that's what I have hoped for in the past as well.

That script to analyse is not that easy to write, because
there are many border cases.

This script never materialized until now, and therefore, for the
time being, I seriously hope this patch will be committed.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]           +49 171 3101372                        13 years to 
go !
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"



--
Dennis Melentyev
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to