> > FWIW, we are seeing 2 x quad-core 2.66GHz outperform (per core) 2 x > > dual-core 3GHz on the same type of m/b, apparently because of better > > bandwidth to memory. However, this is on a compute-intensive workload > > running 1 job per core so would be pretty insensitive to > > scheduler/locking issues. > > Alexey's problem is pretty specific to filesystem performance. Good to > hear though :)
If that is the conclusion, wouldn't it make sense trying a different disk-controller then? -- regards Claus When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner. Shakespeare _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
