On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 05:10:49AM +0300, Jonathan Stewart wrote: > I don't know what the difference might be but I did some digging and > found https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4715#c25
Interestingly enough, there's already been a statement from Terry Lambert about the problem, and it's documented in comment 22: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4715#c22 Additionally, the bug seems to imply that a future release of Samba will simply disable the entire BSD-specific workaround, addressing the issue of missing files -- but will have a tremendous impact on performance when it comes to directories with many files. In general, I really don't like the direction that bug is going. By that I mean, it gives me the impression that there's a ton of OS-specific code within the daemon, and the solution for them may be to add *another* layer of abstraction (by detecting the specific filesystem used on a share, and using different code per filesystem). I think this is bad. Julian, has there been any progress to resolve this outside of what's shown in the bug? I see your name mentioned in comment #6... :-) -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"