On Monday 18 February 2008 05:10:24 am Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > +stable@ > > Yoshihiro Ota wrote: > > Why are so many people are bitten by this? Is that the jobs of port-upgrading > > tool to safe copy these libraries to compat so that all programs using > > the old libraries works? > > Portupgrade preserves the libraries in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg: > % ls /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/ > libicudata.so.36.0 libicule.so.36.0 libicuuc.so.36.0 > libicui18n.so.36.0 libiculx.so.36.0 > libicuio.so.36.0 libicutu.so.36.0 > > ldconfig knows about the directory: > % ldconfig -r | head -2 > /var/run/ld-elf.so.hints: > search directories: > /lib:/usr/lib:/usr/lib/compat:/usr/X11R6/lib:/usr/local/lib:/usr/local/lib/mysql:/usr/local/lib/compat/pkg > > But ldconfig -R don't rescan them: > % ldconfig -R > % ldconfig -r | grep libicudata > 231:-licudata.38 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libicudata.so.38 > 386:-licudata.38 => /usr/local/lib/libicudata.so.38 > > Could anybody investigate it? I have no time now.
Drop the .0 from the filenames or add libfoo.so.36 symlinks. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
