Adrian Chadd wrote:
The project is doing what it can with what people are contributing. If
What if it can accomplish the same or more by simply reorganizing what
it's already doing? I completely understand the apparent situation - if
you look at it from all angles it appears to be no different than that
of the people apposed to the recent scheduling changes FreeBSD has made.
There's a limited amount of people and time to do everything.
you'd like a distribution supported for longer then offer to help
maintain it. You may be surprised how helpful people get when you
offer to help. :0
Again IMHO the only message coming across here is either do it yourself
or keep your mouth shut. The other side of the coin here is - what's to
say the FreeBSD project requires what I can offer? Granted it's been
sometime since I've browsed the entire FreeBSD.org site but last I
checked there wasn't an area devoted to the needs of the project.
Furthermore, just because someone isn't providing assistance doesn't
mean that their concerns should go unheard. It's quite possible what was
proposed is an awful idea and if it is so be it. But it would appear as
though it wasn't even considered.
Regards,
Chris
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
