On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:10:24 -0500, Michael Butler
<[email protected]> wrote:
- From the link (http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/errata.html#WhatComp)
that Steve Kargl referenced (dated July 2012).
I don't know where this guy is getting his info, but CLANG is /more/
standards compliant and doesn't have an issue producing "correct" code.
Though it might not be the fastest (yet).
And if Apple (probably one of the largest commercial CLANG users) doesn't
have an issue with it producing "incorrect" code why should we believe
this guy?
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
