Den 09/11/2012 kl. 16.22 skrev Erik Cederstrand <[email protected]>:
> Den 09/11/2012 kl. 15.36 skrev Warner Losh <[email protected]>: > >> On Nov 9, 2012, at 3:52 AM, Erik Cederstrand wrote: >> >>> Hello toolchainers, >>> >>> I'm attempting to clean up hardcoded ar(1) flags in the tree to use the >>> global ARFLAGS in share/mk/sys.mk instead. I want to be able to add "-D" to >>> ARFLAGS and have it used everywhere. >>> >>> The patch changes some hardcoded flags from e.g. "cru" to the default "rl" >>> or "rv" from sys.mk. Looking at the manpage for ar(1), I'm pretty sure this >>> is safe, and my runtime tests haven't turned out any problems. Loosing the >>> "u" flags means loosing a bit in performance in theory, but I have tested >>> this to be negligible in a buildworld / kernel run. In a later iteration, >>> maybe the default flags can be added a "u". >>> >>> Are there any problems with this patch? >> >> I don't like losing the 'c' flag. Makes things in the build too whiny. >> Why purposely lose the 'u' flag that you know helps performance? >> Why move from cq to rl? This can be a big slow down... > > I'd actually like to add both 'u' and 'c', I just didn't want to both clean > up and change the default in the same patch. A followup patch could be: If there are no other objections, I'll try to both patches into the tree (I have no commit bit myself). Erik _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
