On 12/05/12 08:22, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
On 12/03/12 20:19, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 12/03/12 19:40, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
On 12/01/12 16:53, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
On 11/29/12 15:01, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 11/15/12 09:23, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2012-11-15 09:19, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
On 11/14/12 21:19, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 11/14/12 15:45, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
It installed fine on ia64 and sparc64, both -current.
I don't know how to test. Please advise if there are
simple tests.
Also, just to check, I manually deleted *orig files
from under files/ after applying the patch:
# ls -al /usr/ports/devel/binutils/files/
total 20
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Nov 14 12:58 .
drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Nov 14 13:00 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 353 Nov 14 12:55 patch-bfd_Makefile.in
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 297 Nov 14 12:55 patch-gold_Makefile.in
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 471 Nov 14 12:55 patch-gold_script.cc
#
because I think all files in this directory
will be used as patches, no matter the name.
Am I wrong?
Anton
Just compile test some binaries and see that they link and work ok.
The .orig files are left over when running patch, and has to be removed.
Sorry if I wasn't clear on that in my previous mail.
Thanks for testing!
Regards!
Please be aware that apparently something went wrong with the release of
binutils-2.23 (see the discussion ending in:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-10/msg00339.html
though I doubt the glitches will affect your usage) and it has been
re-released as binutils-2.23.1. Maybe it is better to base the update if
the binutils port on that release.
I noticed that late last night, but haven't had time to update the patch
yet. Thank you for pointing it out.
Regards!
Hi!
Apologies for the delay. Attached is a patch that updates binutils from
2.22 to 2.23.1. Please test it. The plan is to commit it once 9.1 is
out the door and the feature freeze on the ports tree is lifted.
Regards!
I tested your patch on amd64 and i386 systems (all a recent 8.3-STABLE
r243569).
The patch applied cleanly and the resulting port compiled without
problems, both by directly using make and by using portmaster. I tested
the results by recompiling a fairly large application (my gcc based
cross-build environment for embedded development) using gcc 4.7 from the
ports and the new binutils-2.23.1 on both i386 and amd64, Everything
functioned as it should and up to now there were no surprises whatsoever.
I do not have the systems to test the other architectures, but I will
retest on the 10.0-CURRENT i386 and amd64 systems that I expect to
install one of these days. I will come back to you to report on that.
Kind regards,
Hans Ottevanger
I have been taking a closer look at the output of make and find the
following:
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for binutils-2.23.1.tar.bz2.
===> Patching for binutils-2.23.1
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for binutils-2.23.1
I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
===> binutils-2.23.1 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/libgmp.so - found
This happens on both 8.3-STABLE and 10.0-CURRENT. It implies that 11 of
the 14 patches in the directory "files" are not applied. I wonder how
the binutils get to function at all without them, but the patches are
probably for exceptional situations and other architectures then amd64
and i386.
Kind regards,
Hans Ottevanger
Have a look at the files/ directory. It is probably only the .orig
files that are left from applying the patch, or if you didn't apply the
patch with -E, the files are probably still there but empty.
Regards!
Yep, those files are all empty, I should have looked there before
grabbing my mailer. Using patch -E indeed solves the problem. BTW, good
to see that only 3 patches are left.
In other news, I also tested your pathes on an i386 10-CURRENT
installation (r243831 and everything seems to work fine. I had to change
my plans a bit concerning a test on amd64 10-CURRENT. That will have to
wait till a system reshuffle over here, taking place only after 9.1 is
released.
Thank you very much for your help in testing binutils!
There is no need for you to test amd64, unless you want to. I have an
amd64 installation here that I've tested on, and it works fine.
Regards!
--
Niclas Zeising
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
