* Dimitry Andric ([email protected]) wrote:

> > This seems to be same issue as in
> > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20893 for which there is patch
> > review going
> > on 
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140922/236415.html.
> > 
> > Your test case is reproducible with the trunk of llvm/clang and
> > the patch in review resolves it. Other workaround is to disable
> > generation of debug information by removing -g flag.
> 
> Hm, I had assumed this problem was fixed by importing r203311 from
> upstream llvm trunk, in head r263313.  But apparently it is not.
> 
> The upstream patch seems to fix your specific test case, but it is still
> in review, so I prefer to wait until it is actually committed, before I
> import it.

Which worries me is what we do if it's not reviewd until the release. We
can't just tell users to "remove -g flag", can't we?

-- 
Dmitry Marakasov   .   55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56  9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
[email protected]  ..:  jabber: [email protected]    http://www.amdmi3.ru
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to