You [Craig Rodrigues] seem to be checking some ??-xtoolchain-gcc things
officially. I've some user-experience notes from happening to use
powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc in my exploration of FreeBSD. Hopefully some of it
might be of interest. It groups together information from various notices as I
was doing the explorations.
I've been exploring FreeBSD, in part using powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc --but on a
powerpc64 11.0-CURRENT environment for the points at hand: A form of
self-hosting xtoolchain use. As stands I'm limited to powerpc64 and powerpc
contexts for FreeBSD, PowerMacs specifically. So I might over infer general
??-xtoolchain-gcc properties.
My use is not generally of the grab-source and buildworld/buildkernel from
scratch kind of context. The closest I came to that was rebuilding a gcc 4.2.1
built powerpc64 11.0-CURRENT to be a powerpc64-gcc based 11.0-current that had
libc++ in use.
After that I've updated (svnlite update -r??????) and rebuilt a newer
11.0-CURRENT.
I'm not sure if the continuous integration or other ??-xtoolchain-gcc testing
checks on rebuild-for-update kind of context or not. One of the things of note
for me is specific to that kind of context where headers and libraries
temporarily have both old and new vintages around and the right ones need to be
used in specific stages. Other aspects of my use might also go outside the
range of your activity as well.
The primary things that I've run into include:
A) Rebuilds from updated sources were picking up old headers (from, for
example, /usr/include) and old libraries, not just for legacy/ where such makes
sense.
B) I had a specific problem originally with atf-c++ finding the C++ standard
library headers. I added a specific -I for what was
${WORLDTMP}/usr/include/c++/v1 in order for it to find the files. I also put in
a matching -L for /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc++ .
C) powerpc64-gcc automatically looks in /usr/local/include for header files
(like most such ports) and this can pick up the wrong file(s). I ended up using
the manual policy of renaming /usr/local/include/iconv.h during
buildworld/buildkernel so that it would not be found and used where the build
should have found a file with different content from my /usr/src/... area (or
its WORLDTMP copy).
D) I've been limited to WITHOUT_BOOT= WITHOUT_LIB32= by being unable to get the
32-bit environment activity to work: CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=powerpc64-gcc use did not
allow the -melf32ppc_fbsd . Does targeting i386 for BOOT and LIB32 from amd64
have a similar problem with -melf_i386_fbsd ?
E) I've been limited to WITHOUT_GCC_BOOTSTRAP= by XCC being a full path making
the build environment ignore WITH_GCC_BOOTSTRAP= . Similarly WITH_GCC= does not
actually cause gcc 4.2.1 to be built. (I wanted WITHOUT_GNUCXX= in order to try
libc++ only. So I've not tried WITH_GNUCXX= .)
F) I've been limited to WITHOUT_CLANG_BOOTSTRAP= WITHOUT_CLANG= WITHOUT_LLDB=
by various issues when clang related builds are involved. I'll not go into
details.
G) Last I tried it powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc does not correctly install itself
automatically when one attempts to install it in a powerpc64-host context. (It
installs fine on a powerpc (non-64) host context.) This may be associated with
the same points that make the distinction between
/usr/obj/powerpc.powerpc64/usr/src/ (on/in powerpc (non-64)) and
/usr/obj/usr/src/ (on/in powerpc64) as a default path: in part the errors were
empty file name prefixes vs. filled-in prefixes.
H) After the gcc 4.2.1 -> 4.9.1 bootstrap I had to rebuild powerpc64-gcc in
order to get the -pg compiles to always work: without that at least one
required example of such a compile crashed the compiler every time it was
tried. All -pg compiles worked fine after the rebuild. (I used gcc5 to rebuild
4.9.1 because of (G) ending up involved otherwise.) Before, when still booted
from the gcc-4.2.1-based world, the original gcc 4.9.1 compiler did not crash
for -pg compiles.
I) Trying to use powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc from a powerpc (non-64) host does not
work. One aspect is tool chain related: C/C++/assembler usage need to be told
to be 64-bit such that, for example, __powerpc64__ ends up defined for
pre-processor use. That is not happening and incorrect processor generated
files result. For example the assembler reports syntax errors from lack of
definitions related to TOC use for powerpc64.
There are some work arounds involved for things very powerpc64/powerpc context
specific, such as some Makefile*'s forcing use of CC:=gcc . I've not noted such
things above: The above targets what I'd guess might be more general issues.
I've also not noted when 11.0-CURRENT has required a few files to have specific
versions picked out that did not match the snapshot I was generally using at
the time.
My current context for this is:
> # freebsd-version -ku; uname -apKU
> 11.0-CURRENT
> 11.0-CURRENT
> FreeBSD FBSDG5C0 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r280598M: Fri Mar 27
> 18:26:08 PDT 2015
> root@FBSDG5C0:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC64vtsc-NODEBUG powerpc powerpc64
> 1100066 1100066
> # dmesg | head
> ...
> FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r280598M: Fri Mar 27 18:26:08 PDT 2015
> root@FBSDG5C0:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC64vtsc-NODEBUG powerpc
> gcc version 4.9.1 (FreeBSD Ports Collection for powerpc64)
> ...
I originally bootstrapped using -r279514. After that I attempted rebuilding
279514 various times exploring what I could enable successfully vs. what I
could not. -r280598 was my first attempt to svnlite upgrade then rebuild.
The 4.2.1 gcc is not present. Nor has clang been built: 3.4.1 was removed by
make delete-old after the initial bootstrap. I'm using powerpc64-gcc as the
only system compiler after the bootstrap. (This fits with (E) above.)
> make -j 8 CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=powerpc64-gcc \
> WITHOUT_CLANG_BOOTSTRAP= WITHOUT_CLANG= WITHOUT_CLANG_IS_CC= \
> WITHOUT_LLDB= \
> WITHOUT_GCC_BOOTSTRAP= WITHOUT_GCC= WITHOUT_GNUCXX= \
> WITHOUT_BOOT= WITHOUT_LIB32= \
> buildworld buildkernel \
> KERNCONF=GENERIC64vtsc-NODEBUG \
> TARGET=powerpc TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64
For the below: Remember, no 4.2.1 gcc and no clang. So powerpc64-gcc also has
to cover what those would normally be used for, not just the XCC, XCXX, XCPP
usage. (powerpc and powerpc64 via clang is not a supported combination yet
anyway.)
> # more /etc/src.conf
> NO_WERROR=
> WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=
> CC=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-gcc
> CXX=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-g++
> CPP=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-cpp
> CROSS_BINUTILS_PREFIX=/usr/local/powerpc64-freebsd/bin/
> X_COMPILER_TYPE=gcc
> #CFLAGS+=-L/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/lib/.
> # The order of the two CXXFLAGS additions below is important.
> CXXFLAGS+=-I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/c++/v1/. -std=gnu++11
> -L/usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc++/.
> CXXFLAGS+=-I/usr/include/c++/v1/. -std=gnu++11 -L/usr/lib/.
(I make no claim that the above is a general solution but with some care about
how to do builds it has allowed the experiments that I've done. I sometimes
have used /usr/srcC/ instead of /usr/src/ : I have two 11.0-CURRENT source
trees.)
> # more /etc/make.conf
> WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/portswork
> #WITH_DEBUG=
> MALLOC_PRODUCTION=
> # svnlite st /usr/src --no-ignore
> ? /usr/src/.snap
> ? /usr/src/restoresymtable
> M /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_main.c
> M /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_script.c
> ? /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC64vtsc
> ? /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC64vtsc-NODEBUG
> ? /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERICvtsc
> ? /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERICvtsc-NODEBUG
> M /usr/src/sys/powerpc/ofw/ofw_machdep.c
> M /usr/src/sys/powerpc/ofw/ofwcall64.S
All of the above files that are relevant existed and were in use long before I
started the powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc related explorations. ofw_machdep.c is
tied to a PowerMac-specific change for reliable booting. The db_'s and
ofwcall64.S are tied to getting information from early-boot crashes if I get
any more. The GENERIC*'s relate to that early-information gathering and to
disabling ps3 so that I can then also have both vt and sc enabled.
As this has been an exploration of the unfamiliar, I've had false starts,
backtracking, and the like. While I've learned a bunch I doubt that I could
start over and get to where I am by a step-by-step procedure that avoided
backtracking, pondering, retries, and so on. In some respects I've been lucky
that certain types of changes did not happen between my original and upgraded
vintages: things would not have worked that did work.
===
Mark Millard
markmi at dsl-only.net
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
