https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215193
David Chisnall <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from David Chisnall <[email protected]> --- I think that a better solution to this would be more frequent upstream imports into base (which should become a lot easier to push to users once we have packaged base). Making libc++ a private library would mean that it would not be possible for users to compile C++ programs without installing a port, which would be a major regression. If we did that, then there's little point having a C++ compiler in the base system at all. Libc++ aims to be backwards binary compatible, and so there shouldn't be any POLA violations from installing a newer one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
