https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
Jan Beich (mail not working) <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #17 from Jan Beich (mail not working) <[email protected]> --- Hmm, not much bustage thanks to DragonFly dogfooding GCC 5 before us. (In reply to Pedro F. Giffuni from comment #3) > why not jump directly to GCC6 instead of GCC5? Why not GCC 7? exp-runs are slow and often contain false positives. Having more results at once would speed up fixing similar issues en masse using portmgr hatchet^W blanket, a win in the long run. If there're many misoptimizations or compiler crashes we can backtrack to GCC 6 or just temporarily pin those few ports to an older version. (In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #4) > I guess it would be at least 50% or more above. (See the dependencies in > PR 196712 for how much pain that last update was.) Still peanuts compared to Clang/libc++ updates. ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
