https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223551
--- Comment #3 from s...@bsdmail.com --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #2) You're saying the X prefix doesn't replace buildworld compilers and utils in make.conf settings, it supplements them. If this is the case, perhaps this is an incorrect bug report. My intent was to replace binutils with either elfutils or llvm's utils. It was in part for purposes of not having to build/install utils and compilers twice (from the base system, then again from ports), and for modularity and efficiency of utils and compilers. As far as I'm aware, all of binutil's replacements are not completed. Down the road it will be better for testing, if there is a false sense that the package/ports compiler and utils are used, when base components are used. llvm40 and llvm50 work much the same. I used llvm50, because I thought perhaps it's binutils' replacements were more developed. Here's a sample of my src.conf to use clang/llvm from packages. #WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN=yes #binutils is needed WITH_BINUTILS=yes WITH_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP=yes WITHOUT_CLANG=yes WITHOUT_CLANG_BOOTSTRAP=yes WITHOUT_CPP=yes # uncertain about WITHOUT_CXX=yes # needed for devd, gperf and c++ libraries # will use llvm40/50 WITH_LLVM_LIBUNWIND=yes WITH_LLD_BOOTSTRAP=yes WITH_LLD_IS_LD=yes WITH_LLVM_LIBUNWIND=yes WITHOUT_CROSS_COMPILER=yes WITHOUT_GCC=yes WITHOUT_GCC_BOOTSTRAP=yes WITHOUT_GDB=yes WITHOUT_GPL_DTC=yes WITHOUT_GNU=yes WITHOUT_GNUCXX=yes WITHOUT_GNU_SUPPORT=yes WITH_LLVM_LIBUNWIND=yes With your information, I will adjust my src.conf and make.conf and see if that works for the linker and utils. Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
