Warner Losh пишет:
I've tested it in -CURRENT with x11/nvidia-driver and official USB stack
- problem can't be reproduced, but scanning speed is much lower than
with HPS' USB stack.
Is there any hope that it will be solved in the near future?
Define: Much slower. With my scanner, I can't measure a difference in
speed using xsane between the two, although I have done only limited
testing with hps' stack.
Sorry for some confusion on my part, I thought that HPS' USB stack is
already in -CURRENT. But anyway, here are results (and question still
stands - is there any way to speed up scanning process; difference
becomes hours for hundreds of images):
$ uname -a #(+ HPS' USB stack revision 538)
FreeBSD host01 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #1: Wed Aug 1 05:45:10 MSD
2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HOST01 i386
$ uname -a
FreeBSD host01.localdomain 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Jul
26 07:45:03 MSD 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
$ uname -r
6.2-STABLE
$ time scanimage -p --mode color --resolution 600 --quick-format max >
/PUBLIC/TMP/000-DEL/6_2-600-max01.pnm
Progress: 100.0%
real 0m40.984s
user 0m3.414s
sys 0m0.821s
$ uname -r
7.0-CURRENT
$ time scanimage -p --resolution 600 --quick-format max --mode color >
/PUBLIC/TMP/000-DEL/7_0-600-max01.pnm
Progress: 100.0%
real 0m56.550s
user 0m3.729s
sys 0m0.597s
$ uname -r
6.2-STABLE
$time scanimage -p --mode color --depth 16 --resolution 600
--quick-format max > /PUBLIC/TMP/000-DEL/6_2-600-16-max01.pnm
Progress: 100.0%
real 1m4.007s
user 0m7.485s
sys 0m1.731s
$ uname -r
7.0-CURRENT
$ time scanimage -p --mode color --depth 16 --quick-format max
--resolution 600 > /PUBLIC/TMP/000-DEL/7_0-600-16-max01.pnm
Progress: 100.0%
real 1m40.989s
user 0m7.606s
sys 0m1.238
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
