On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Andrew Reilly <andrew-free...@areilly.bpc-users.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 01:25:22PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: >> In message: <2fd864e0903020512i22b2c31fg487aaf37fed63...@mail.gmail.com> >> Astrodog <astro...@gmail.com> writes: >> : As unfortunate (and annoying) as that delay was, your system was in a >> : "defined" state, at the end of rc.d. As things stand now, that doesn't >> : appear to be the case anymore, and I think that may be a more >> : significant issue than the delay. >> >> I'd be happy with synchronous dhcp. > > The more general problem is the (large) number of network > applications that assume that network addresses and routes never > change (because that's how things were when they were written.) > My personal pet peeve is ntpd, but there are many others. Any > daemon that caches host IP address information at startup is > (IMO) broken, and needs to be fixed. There are many reasons why > network addresses may change *after* startup, and it is not > reasonable to go around and manually HUP everything when that > happens. > > Needing synchronous DHCP as a work-around here is just the > signifier of the problem: it isn't the over-all solution.
I completely and wholeheartedly agree with you. This could be more difficult with contributed software, but it can be done! Thanks =], -Garrett _______________________________________________ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
