On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> I would not recommend using signals with libusb. It is not portable.
> Currently signals are ignored. What you would have to do, is to use

OK.

> the timeout argument which you are doing, and have a timekeeper
> variable somewhere, or create another thread. Still, when using the
> timeout there is a chance you can loose data.

The problem is that the timeout seems to be ignored sometimes - that is 
the only reason I was playing with alarm() at all.

I have the timeout set to 100 (milliseconds?) yet I find if I restart 
the program every now and then it will get stuck on the first read.

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to