On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:

On Tuesday 14 June 2011 02:58:44 Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Sunday 12 June 2011 23:50:24 Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Saturday 11 June 2011 23:43:11 Charles Sprickman wrote:


Ok, then those quirks won't help.

For OHCI, I guess you should check vmstat -i.

Oddly enough, the box paniced today, but it appeared to be related to fxp.
However in the coredump summary, I have "vmstat -i" output, and ohci seems
fairly high in comparison to everything else:

vmstat -i

interrupt                          total       rate
irq4: uart0                          106          0
irq10: ohci0                   142322001     968176
irq14: ata0                         1178          8
irq20: fxp0                      3008691      20467
irq21: fxp1                      1733357      11791
irq28: sym1                           30          0
irq29: sym0                      2624749      17855
cpu0: timer                    728063100    4952810
cpu1: timer                    728044684    4952684
Total                         1605797896   10923795

Also, just a brief summary of the panic, since it mentions the interrupt
process again:

Hi,

The OHCI IRQ rate is too high. It should never exceed 1000 IRQ/s. Maybe you
can build a kernel with "options USB_DEBUG", then run the following command
and post some of the resulting dmesg:

sysctl hw.usb.ohci.debug=16 ; sleep 1; sysctl hw.usb.ohci.debug=0

Thanks again... I just booted a kernel with USB_DEBUG and turned the sysctl on for a bit. Was quite hard to turn it off though, but it also looks like time went backward on the machine, so maybe "sleep" never caught up with itself. The output is pretty long, so I posted it here:

http://pastebin.com/HdnBYk6k  (set to never expire)

Another interesting note. On boot, conserver failed to start for no reason I could find. When I initially ran "vmstat -i" before manually starting conserver, the interrupt rate for ohci was much lower, maybe 30/S or so. Starting conserver brought it up to 200-300/S. Conserver was running during the debug logging.

Also a full dmesg is here:

http://pastebin.com/4kEYYNse

Thanks,

Charles

--HPS


#7  0x8059139b in fxp_new_rfabuf (sc=0x8564c000, rxp=0x8564c1c0)
     at /usr/src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c:2611
#8  0x8059285b in fxp_intr (xsc=0x8564c000)
     at /usr/src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c:1931
#9  0x8067b1db in intr_event_execute_handlers (p=0x8553d7f8,
ie=0x8557d080)
     at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:1220
#10 0x8067c8eb in ithread_loop (arg=0x856525d0)
     at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:1233
#11 0x80678f11 in fork_exit (callout=0x8067c880 <ithread_loop>,
     arg=0x856525d0, frame=0xd80e7d38) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:844
#12 0x80931de0 in fork_trampoline () at
/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:270

And also unrelated to usb, but fairly bizarre "netstat -m" output:

18446744073709550887/1355/626/25600 mbuf clusters in use
(current/cache/total/max)
18014398509480560K/3497K/2073K bytes allocated to network
(current/cache/total)

Sorry for all the extra noise, but I'm not adept enough at determining
whether this panic was usb related or fxp related.

Thanks,

Charles

--HPS

_______________________________________________
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to