sorry I did not send directly to the list ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: john smith <[email protected]> Date: Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:18 PM Subject: Re: sata to usb not working To: Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]>
I've done the upgrade, but still get the same errors. How exactly should I tweak the timings? Any hints? Tks On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:22 AM, john smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > I'm doing the upgrade to -stable (still in "buildworld"), in the meantime > I've found out that the powered one (the one without enclosure) works if in > turn connected to a powered hub (both must have external power to work). > Here is the relevant usbconfig output: > > ugen7.2: <USB2.0 Hub vendor 0x05e3> at usbus7, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH > (480Mbps) pwr=SAVE > ugen7.3: <product 0x5106 vendor 0x174c> at usbus7, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH > (480Mbps) pwr=ON > > here the /var/log/messages: > > kernel: ugen7.3: <vendor 0x174c> at usbus7 > kernel: umass0: <vendor 0x174c product 0x5106, class 0/0, rev 2.10/0.01, > addr 3> on usbus7 > kernel: umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x0000 > kernel: umass0:5:0:-1: Attached to scbus5 > kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): REPORT LUNS. CDB: a0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 > 0 0 > kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error > kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition > kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:20,0 > (Invalid command operation code) > kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Error 22, Unretryable error > kernel: da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus5 target 0 lun 0 > kernel: da0: <ST925082 7AS 3.CM> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device > kernel: da0: 40.000MB/s transfers > kernel: da0: 238475MB (488397168 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 30401C) > > > > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:23 PM, john smith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ok, thanks, will let you know. >> >> On 2/1/13, Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Friday 01 February 2013 08:59:07 john smith wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> thanks for you reply. >> >> Is upgrading to -stable conditio sine qua non? >> >> If so I'll give it a try. >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > If you are on 9-release and upgrade to 9-stable, should not break >> anything. >> > >> > If you have USB modules in /boot/modules, those might have to be >> > re-compiled. >> > >> > --HPS >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
