On May 28, 2013, at 5:20 PM, Outback Dingo <outbackdi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Craig Rodrigues > <rodr...@crodrigues.org>wrote: > >> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Outback Dingo <outbackdi...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> I wrote a blog post specifically for installing 10-CURRENT from a >>>> snapshot ISO and getting bootstrapped >>>> from there, to help the Google Summer of Code Student that I am >>>> mentoring. >>>> What specifically do you want to be backported to 9-STABLE? >>>> >>> >>> Yes Ive seen the post, however we have a hard requirement for 9-STABLE >>> for some development work we are >>> currently involved in. And I would prefer not to move our current >>> infrastructure for development to CURRENT. >>> A major portion of our development environment is based on XEN for >>> testing and development. >>> Therefor we realize PVHM is a work in progress, and we have built some >>> VMs from it, they run exceptionally >>> well, However our build environments refuse to build 9-STABLE on CURRENT >>> PVHVM, or 10-CURRENT. >>> Lastly Im sure theres a ton of users who would like to see this in 9.x or >>> 9-STABLE >>> >>> >> >> OK, I misunderstood you since you responded in the thread and quoted some >> of my post. >> My blog post has nothing relevant to Xen and PVHM, and is specific to >> setting up >> a Google Summer of Code student on a 10-CURRENT environment. The FreeBSD >> Xen >> and PVHM developers will need to provide the details about their plans to >> merge their changes to the 9-STABLE branch..... >> that's something which I am not familiar with. >> > > If we can get a diff of the work done against the master Id be happy to > help backporting and testing I plan to backport the work once we have it all in -current. -- Justin _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"