On Monday, December 23, 2013 5:08:45 pm John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, December 23, 2013 5:01:45 pm Neel Natu wrote:
> > Hi John,
> > This looks good - thanks for adding this support!
> > I noticed that the RESET_REGISTER is not being advertised in the FACP
> > flags field. So, perhaps the access to 0xCF9 that you saw during
> > testing was triggered by cpu_reset_real() as opposed to AcpiReset()?
> Yeah, that might explain why I had to comment out the 0x64 check in
> bhyverun.c directly as AcpiReset() should take precedence before
> cpu_reset_real() is invoked. I'll retest that tomorrow to make sure I have
> the FACP correct.
With that fixed, ACPI now resets via 0xcf9 before trying 0x64.
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to