Yes, I tried to emphasized that both at the beginning and at the end of the
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Matthias Gamsjager
> And lets not forget the head start vmware has (bhyve is what? 1-2 years
> old?) and the size of it. Less then 1mb in code.
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Łukasz Wąsikowski <luk...@wasikowski.net
> > wrote:
>> W dniu 2014-01-28 12:18, Andrea Brancatelli pisze:
>> > We did a very rough comparison betweend BHyVe and VMWare ESXi. Maybe you
>> > want to give it a read and let me know if I did write a bunch of sh!t
>> > I must say I'm very pleased with BHyVe performances! Very good work!!
>> > Thanks for your time.
>> You've wrote:
>> BHyVe took 332 seconds
>> VMWare took 313 seconds
>> The difference is about 106.7%.
>> I think that the correct conclusion should state: if we assume VMware's
>> time as a reference than BHyVe was 6.7% slower (not 106.7%). And it
>> should be 6,41% really :)
>> best regards,
>> Lukasz Wasikowski
>> email@example.com mailing list
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
*Andrea BrancatelliSchema 31 S.r.l. - Socio UnicoResponsabile ITROMA -
FIRENZE - PALERMO ITALYTel: +39. 06.98.358.472*
*Cell: +39 331.2488468Fax: +39. 055.71.880.466Società del Gruppo SC31
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to