On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 06:39:18PM -0700, Neel Natu wrote:
> The VM-exit instruction length field is valid only for a subset of VM
> exits. See section 27.2.4 "Information for VM exits due to instruction
> execution" in the Intel SDM.
> 
> In particular, the instruction length is not guaranteed to be valid if
> the VM-exit is due to a hardware exception. Therefore it cannot be
> used to "skip over" the UD2 instruction.
> 
> On my machine the VM-exit instruction length field was set to '2' for
> the first UD2 and '5' for the second UD2.

OK, thx for the clarification.

> For this specific test, you can either hardcode the instruction length
> to '2' if the VM exit is due to a UD2 or use an instruction like "OUT"
> to a specific I/O port to trigger the monitor-trap-flag on and off. A
> VM-exit due to "OUT" will have the correct value in the VM-exit
> instruction length field.

But this "instruction length" issue only affects my way to toggle
the MTF bit. The MTF itself does not rely internally on the
"instruction length" field, or does it?
As far as I understand, bhyve does not need a valid instruction length
for MTF, because the handler returns VMEXIT_RESTART. No need for bhyve
to adjust the rip on vmentry.

If I set the MTF bit via bhyvectl, the guest system still
seems to enter a loop.
My mtrap handler writes the RIP to a file, but all I see are high
addresses e.g:

0xffffffff806bf0b0 Xapic_isr1

According to kdb, these are addresses point to Xapic_isr1 and
interrupt handlers.

I wonder if a vmexit caused by the MTF could overlay with another
vmexit. With the MTF bit set, I expect the guest system to
behave exactly as without the MTF bit. Of course slower due to
single stepping :).

Regards,
Martin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
"freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to