On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:20 , Willem Jan Withagen <w...@digiware.nl> wrote:
> I think I understand your critique, but then on the other hand I wonder > where the reluctance is.... As I read it, things are going to be enabled > in CURRENT only (for the time). Which is exactly for the reasons you > worry about: Is it going to be reliable enough?? No, the answer to that still is “no” in it’s current state and we know that. I think one of the main problems is that no one has been able to pull the thing to the end in the last three years. Why should it happen within 6 weeks now? I think it would be a really good idea to do that but the current TODO list, I think, is by far not sufficing. There’s a second problem we’ll hit in that same timeframe: general network stack breakage; we’ll hit the times when we’ll not be sure if things broke because of VIMAGE or are also broken in the normal network stack. There’ll be a lot of regression test writing and debugging to be done. That all said, I’d like to see it happen as well, but I’d love to have a lot of the issues being addressed first before putting a date on it to enable it in GENERIC in HEAD. /bz — Bjoern A. Zeeb "Come on. Learn, goddamn it.", WarGames, 1983 _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"