On Thursday, June 11, 2015 04:50:52 PM Stefan Andritoiu wrote:
> From the FreeBSD Handbook: "FreeBSD deals with interrupt handlers by
> giving them their own thread context".
> From my understanding when a IPI is received the thread that will run
> it is placed on the real-time runq, and the scheduler will be invoked
> to schedule it.
> So the sequence should be:
> currently running thread -> scheduler thread -> interrupt handler ->
> scheduler thread -> previously interrupted thread (if no thread
> priority change took place inside the interrupt handler)
> Is this correct?
(Sorry these replies are dated.)
IPIs do not run in a dedicated thread. Only device interrupt handlers
run in a dedicated thread. IPIs (and some device handlers such as timer
interrupts) borrow the stack of the currently executing thread to run
their handler. As a result, you should have no context switches when
an IPI is received unless the IPI handler specifically invokes one.
One IPI that explicitly swithes is IPI_PREEMPT. However, other IPIs can
result in a switch if the interrupted thread is running in userland and
a context switch to another thread is performed via the checks in
userret() and/or ast(). This is how IPI_AST is used. It has a NULL
handler and is only sent to trigger the side effects in userret() in
case the thread is executing in userland.
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to