On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorods...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jason Helfman wrote: > > > I have a number of ports that I maintain, that I really never use but at > > one time I did. Initially, I put them into the portstree to help out the > > community, with the idea that I would be using them one day, however I > work > > at a VMware shop, and the likelihood of me using this software is looking > > far less likely. I was wondering if it would be okay to assign these > ports > > to virtualization group? > > > > deskutils/virt-manager > > devel/libvirt > > devel/libvirt-glib > > devel/libvirt-java > > devel/py-libvirt > > devel/spice-protocol > > net-mgmt/virt-viewer > > FWIW, I could take care of libvirt, py-libvirt, libvirt-glib and > virt-manager. > > Roman Bogorodskiy > > Sounds good, thanks! Additionally, if you are going to take virt-manager, you really should take spice-protocol and virt-viewer as they are dependencies and require updates for virt-manager. Thoughts? -jgh -- Jason Helfman | FreeBSD Committer j...@freebsd.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power to Serve _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"