added a comment.

  In, @royger wrote:
  > I guess this supersedes I would expand 
the commit message so that it's explicitly stated why the hypervisor vector 
should have a lower priority.
  Oh, I didn't see 5254 at all, thank you for pointing it to me :)
  hyperv interrupt currently only services so called 'external devices' (it's 
event timer is not yet used; even if it was used, it would be serviced by the 
same IDT vector, so vector priority would not matter).  So we don't want to 
delay LAPIC timer interrupt or IPIs, if all three types of interrupt happens at 
the same time.
  Its just a POC same as 5254, which is also a POC IMHO, what we really need is 
to have a hyperv file reside in kernel and we will need to change 
native_lapic_create() in the same way as XEN.
  Well, I think its probably high time to add a hyperv file to always reside in 
kernel, since we have a TSC calibration fix will need that too.



To:, adrian, delphij,,,, royger
Cc: freebsd-virtualization-list
_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 

Reply via email to