Russell L. Carter wrote:
So I am wondering if UFS in the -current guest might be better
overall. I can certainly do a multiple hour experiment, installing
a new guest with UFS root, but since I am new to this, perhaps there is
conventional wisdom about ZFS vs. UFS in the guest? Maybe UFS in the
guest requires less cpu resources from the host? Or not?
i think you should do that experiment and share your results here.
my similar experiment did not involve bhyve. i make a zvol and put a ufs
inside, and mounted that. for writing, it was so much faster than raw
zfs, that i wondered if i should start migrating other things to it. as
two examples, postgres servers and MH "Mail" directories go really
really fast in ufs-on-zvol compared to zfs.
all my bhyve's are ufs, and their system disks are host zvols, not host
zfs files made with "truncate". i admit that this was superstition on my
part, but it's served me very well. one of my guests even expanded his
bhyve file systems using geom and tunefs, after i made his zvol bigger.
so, there's not much downside that i've seen.
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to