> BTW, I found this a couple of weeks ago and it has just been updated: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157182 > <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157182> > > >> Le 6 févr. 2017 à 11:11, Vincent Olivier <vinc...@up4.com> a écrit : >> >> Hi, >> >> Has anyone succeeded in having a bhyve VM tap interface on an aggregate >> interface (lagg)? From what I have read until now, it seems to be a known >> problem, and my experience shows that it is still an issue with FreeBSD 11, >> so I would like to know if it is because tap/bridging a lagg is not a >> reasonable thing to do anyway… >> >> Regards, >> >> Vincent I have multiple machines on which 2 or more nics make up a LACP lagg with vlans on it. Those vlan interfaces are in bridges together with the tap interfaces that are in use by bhyve vms. Works as long as I "up" the nics in a specific fasion ( " -tso4 -lro -vlanhwtag " ) . This works on 10.3 and 11.0 as far as I'm aware and I have never experienced problems with it (Intel / AMD / em driver / bce driver, re driver , all kinds of combinations). I have no experience in comparable setups without the vlan "layer" though. What seems to be your predicament? Regards, Ruben _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"