Hi Dustin,
On 07/02/17 03:52, Dustin Marquess wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Ruben <m...@osfux.nl> wrote: >> Hi Vincent, >> >> >> >>> BTW, I found this a couple of weeks ago and it has just been updated: >>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157182 >>> <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157182> >>> >>> >>>> Le 6 févr. 2017 à 11:11, Vincent Olivier <vinc...@up4.com> a écrit : >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Has anyone succeeded in having a bhyve VM tap interface on an aggregate >>>> interface (lagg)? From what I have read until now, it seems to be a known >>>> problem, and my experience shows that it is still an issue with FreeBSD >>>> 11, so I would like to know if it is because tap/bridging a lagg is not a >>>> reasonable thing to do anyway… >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Vincent >> I have multiple machines on which 2 or more nics make up a LACP lagg >> with vlans on it. Those vlan interfaces are in bridges together with the >> tap interfaces that are in use by bhyve vms. >> >> Works as long as I "up" the nics in a specific fasion ( " -tso4 -lro >> -vlanhwtag " ) . This works on 10.3 and 11.0 as far as I'm aware and I >> have never experienced problems with it (Intel / AMD / em driver / bce >> driver, re driver , all kinds of combinations). >> >> I have no experience in comparable setups without the vlan "layer" though. > I've gotten it to work both with and without vlan just by using > -vlanhwtag. Leaving lro & tso4 enabled works fine. Interesting Dustin, I will try re-enabling those features in the months to come. > > -Dustin Kind regards, Ruben _______________________________________________ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
