> Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > > > > > > Are there issues with Current CEntos and bhyve? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure there are, please look at > > > > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230453 > > > > > > > > > > > > Booting in UEFI mode works. > > > > > > > > > > This means we need an update to > > > > > /usr/local/share/examples/vm-bhyve/centos7.conf ? > > > > > It says 'loader="grub"' for the present. > > > > > > > > > > Do you have a vm config to boot centos7 in UEFI mode you could share? > > > > > > > > I just use /usr/share/examples/bhyve/vmrun.sh. I don't use any > > > > third-party utility to manage bhyve VMs. vmrun.sh is pretty > > > > straight-forward. > > > > > > Thanks for replying. However, I highly recommend vm-bhyve, maybe you > > > should give it a try. You will love the ease of VM creation and > > > provisioning, network management, ZFS integration (VM snapshots and > > > cloning), console and datastore management etc. > > > > Though it has a lot of features, it also has some short comings, > > like you can not spec a vm to be wired in memory, which IMHO is > > the only way to insure consistent VM performance. > > Well, we have "bhyve_options" configuration option in the vm config, > why not put "-S" there, is that what you mean by wiring the vm in > memory?
I believe that fails as that only adds the -S to bhyve, and you must specify it both on bhyveload and bhyve for it to work. > > > > Its artificial restriction of 16 character VM names is also > > a fair bit annoying. > > Maybe. Maybe? No, factually. I migrated a number of ESXi VM's and had to patch vm-bhyve to not have this restriction, so it is annoying. -- Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"