On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 05:45:52PM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote: > On Saturday, August 25, 2018 8:55:05 AM UTC Paul Webster via freebsd- > virtualization wrote: > > ... I personally have: > > > > Windows Server 2012 > > CentOS 6 > > Debian > > FreeBSD > > OpenBSD > > and a few other more strange linuxs I believe (got a zpool full of the > > zvols (not named very well ;))) ... > > i have no exotic linuxes, but two fairly modern debians. i remain mystified > by > the behaviour of grub-bhyve, which usually fails (no meaningful error > message) > and seems like won't run from /etc/rc.local (must be run from a shell.) so, > one of my bhyve servers can't restart automatically, and i don't know why. > and > i recently saw that the grub-bhyve package now lacks a maintainer, and may be > removed.
I've found that the big distros (CentOS, Debian, Ubuntu) work very well with bhyve's UEFI support. It has been years since I used either bhyveload or grub-bhyve. CentOS does need a little massaging, renaming GRUBx64.efi to BOOTx64.efi or something like that. I can never remember off-hand. But other than renaming a file, Linux works great. :) Thanks, -- Shawn Webb Cofounder and Security Engineer HardenedBSD Tor-ified Signal: +1 443-546-8752 Tor+XMPP+OTR: [email protected] GPG Key ID: 0x6A84658F52456EEE GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89 3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
