> > On 3/30/19 2:37 PM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > >> On 3/30/19 1:08 AM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > >>> > >>> So it is a edk2 implementation, and can you point me at > >>> the bhyve version of it? The Qemu/KVM version is rather > >>> not relavent to this discussion as that would not work due > >>> to core vmm implementation differences. > > > Yes, OVMF is part of the TianoCore EDK2. OVMF/KVM is relevant in my > opinion because the BHYVE UEFI firmware is a port of OVMF. In fact, with > Scott's changes there's no longer a BhyvePkg, but our copy of OvmfPkg > works with Bhyve. The code can be found at > https://gitlab.com/scott-ph/edk2/tree/wip/2019-03/v2-bhyve-rebase-edk2-stable201903 > > . > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^ This is the critical version, this is the > > version of the SMBIOS/dmitables implemented by the bios. > > > I think you're confused: I wasn't asking about updating the version of > _SMBIOS_ that Bhyve uses, just the BIOS version and release date that > are shown in the BIOS section of the SMBIOS data.
Ack, I get your queston now, and my answer is: Yes if Scott updated the edk2 port the bios version in that should defanitly be bumped. What SMBIOS version is it reporting, out of curosity as I need to do some work on that part of it with respect to my VM_MAXCPU changes. (Three reviews process, expect 3 to 5 more before work is completed.) > Rebecca Cran -- Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
