> Thanks for the replies, everyone. > > > Do you have any desired parameters? > > Performance Driven? Simplicity? > I failed to mention that. I'm interested in performance, especially low > CPU overhead.
Then a netmap based solution is probably in line with your goal. > I had tried vale+tap on a stable/12 host, but it wouldn't pass traffic, > so I started this thread as a feeler for what was expected to work on > which branches. Since then, I updated the host to head, and vale+tap works. > > I'm very interested in vale+ptnetmap. It seems to be partially > committed to head, but not entirely. Is that right? I am not well informed as to the state of this. > Thanks again. -- Rod Grimes [email protected] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
