> As far as I remember it works just fine other than the standard caveats about > bridging over wireless interfaces which involve some odd inconsistencies that > could crop up from time to time especially with like DHCP, but a lot of that > depends on your network config as a whole. > The approach I would consider taking for a wireless host is if the guest > doesn't need direct access to the network just do a NAT network or a routed > network and route through the wlan interface instead of trying to do bridging > with it directly.
One very problematic area for wireless and bhyve is that each guests have a different MAC, wireless does NOT like that, as the AP usually associates with one and only one MAC address. > --- > Jason Barbier | E: [email protected] > GPG: FD7D2D5F0A0FBE39 (https://keybase.io/kusuriya) > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020, at 09:03, tech-lists wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As subject: can a machine that only uses wlan0 for its connectivity > > be a bhyve host? Context is 12.2-stable r367858 amd64. > > > > Asking because ISTR some issue with bridging, but that was a while ago. > > I'm anticipating managing instances with vm-bhyve. Previously have set > > instances manually on other server hardware. > > > > thanks, > > -- > > J. > > > > Attachments: > > * signature.asc > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[email protected]" > -- Rod Grimes [email protected] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
