On 15 February 2013 18:21, PseudoCylon <moonlightak...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> Hm, that sounds right, what's the code doing wrong?
> Currently, it seems the sta sends back ht params the ap included in a
> PROBE_RESP packet. So, the ap could send ampdu packets bigger (in
> byte) than the sta can handle or packet gaps are different from the
> sta wants after ba session is created. (During ba session negotiation,
> these params are not exchanged, only window sizes (frame count), seq
> #, and token.)
Right. yes, we should be negotiating the ampdu density to be the
maximum of what the AP and STA can associate.
Same deal with IBSS peers (and mesh peers too, eventually.)
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"