On 3 Dec 2008, at 19:27, Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 21:54 +0000, Doug Rabson wrote:
Did you get to run FreeBSD in HVM mode? What version of Xen, and who
On 1 Dec 2008, at 18:45, Ivan Voras wrote:
2008/12/1 Doug Rabson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I will be working on improving Xen support in FreeBSD for the new
months. My main goal is to add support for native Xen drivers to an
kernel which is running in Xen's HVM mode. These drivers will take
the slow emulated devices and provide most of the performance
benefits of a
paravirtualised kernel. I'm initially going to be supporting
FreeBSD 6.x but
I will port it all forward to head and 7.x when it works properly.
For the not-quite-yet-initiated : does this mean you're working on
paravirtualized drivers for Xen dom-U ("guest" case)?
Sort of. The latest versions of Xen support something called HVM mode
which allows it to boot a completely unmodified guest OS using
emulated devices in a similar way to e.g. VMware Fusion. It is then
possible to incrementally add Xen-aware paravirtualised drivers which
can replace the emulated ones and which perform better. This is how
they support Windows under Xen.
playing the dom0?
The reason for the question is that I have patchy experience with HVM:
while I have Windows XP Professional running happily, OpenSolaris
would lock up on the regular basis.
I am running Xen 3.2.1 with OpenSuse x86_64 11.0 in the dom0.
I'm running XenServer 5.0 which is (I think) running a linux-2.6.18
kernel with roughly xen-3.2.2.
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"