2009/5/19 Saifi Khan <saifi.k...@twincling.org>: > . is dom0 support something that FreeBSD will target at some > point in time or would be happy to be domU ?
If Kip (and other Xen-clueful people get funding) - and there's time - then I bet so. > . there was some mention of vimage/bitvisor in one of the > slides (i think on scribd.com). So, is it that jails getting > extended to support virtualization+containers and thus a > entirely different approach which does not use Xen ? These solve different problem sets. :) People seem to think "virtualisation" is "virtualisation". It isn't. It depends on what kind(s) of problems you're trying to solve. Xen solves a certain set of virtualisation problems. > . is it envisaged that a stable NetBSD dom0 implementation > would then be ported to FreeBSD (maybe) ? No idea. Is it stable? :) Personally, I'd prefer to see the FreeBSD DomU stuff 100% bulletproof and documented before more stuff is hacked on, but as I said before, I'm just interested in getting the current pieces into some kind of documented shape; I'm not hacking on Xen by any stretch of the imagination! Adrian _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"