Ahh... Thanks for the answer. I guess we will keep the
performance-bound FreeBSD servers standalone then.

Rgds,

On 2010-06-19, Guillaume Seigneuret <g...@omegacube.fr> wrote:
> As far as I could try, FreeBSD 8 paravitualized is not suitable for
> production use.
> It crashes under stress.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Guillaume Seigneuret
>
>
>
> Network and System Security Architect
> Web : http://www.omegacube.fr
> Address :
> Hôtel Technologique - BP 100
> Technopôle de Château Gombert
> 13382 Marseille Cedex 13
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] De
> la part de Pandu Poluan
> Envoyé : samedi 19 juin 2010 07:53
> À : freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
> Objet : Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 Host
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm just trying to confirm: Is it true that FreeBSD 8's support for
> Paravirtualized Guest on XenServer still experimental/beta?
>
> Because we need to make sure that FreeBSD-based *production* servers
> can be paravirtualized on the xenserver hosts -- performance reasons.
>
> That said, I've tried installing FreeBSD 8 in HVM mode, seems to work
> okay -- might be suitable for the 1 or 2 servers that does not need
> highest performance.
>
> PS: I'm not really familiar with FreeBSD, though I am familiar with
> Linux. Some hand-holding will be appreciated :-)
>
> Rgds,
> --
> Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer
> My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

--
Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer
My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to