On Wed, Aug 28, 2013, at 13:28, Colin Percival wrote: > Hi Roger, > > On 08/28/13 08:44, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On 27/08/13 07:08, Colin Percival wrote: > >> I've attached a patch which eliminates the XENHVM kernel configuration and > >> instead allows FreeBSD to run under Xen/HVM with PV drivers by loading a > >> new xenhvm.ko module from the boot loader. > > > > I'm sorry to say this, but I'm not sure this is the best way to move > > forward, I would prefer to just have the files merged directly into the > > GENERIC kernel rather than having to load a module. Also with the PVHVM > > changes I've posted earlier I'm modifying some common files, which > > cannot be put into a module, so it makes me wonder if it's worth it to > > have some Xen specific code into a module while the rest of it is > > already integrated into GENERIC. > > Are your changes going to be integrated into HEAD in time for > 10.0-RELEASE? > (i.e., before the code freeze starts, 10 days from now?) >
This is important to me as well. I need to know what to help test if we have 10 days to nail this down. It will be embarrassing to not have XENHVM in GENERIC by 10.0. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
