I guess I could try it and see.... but is it also true that we no longer
have to do the dance with removing the cd/dvd drive and fixing fstab for ad0
device naming convention?
And what about the NO_ADAPTIVE _* kernel options - not needed?

Jay West, President
EZwind.net
11 The Pines Court, Suite B
Chesterfield, MO 63141
P: 314-781-1800
F: 314-558-9284
E: jw...@ezwind.net
W: www.ezwind.net

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org]
On Behalf Of Mark Felder
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 1:24 PM
To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.0-R as Xen 'guest' - clarification?



On Wed, Jan 29, 2014, at 9:28, Karl Pielorz wrote:
> 
> And for 'xen tools' - we're still correct to install the port of 
> 'sysutils/xe-guest-utilities' - correct?
> 

Yes, I have a few VMs deployed working marvellously with 10.0-RELEASE and
sysutils/xe-guest-utilities _______________________________________________
freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


_______________________________________________
freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to